Cillian Murphy Not Involved in "28 Years Later" After All

Murphy could make an appearance in "28 Years Later: The Bone Temple"

By Jonas Reichel on

There was a lot of excitement about Cillian Murphy's possible return in "28 Years Later". Contrary to all expectations, however, his character will not be featured in the zombie shocker.

The rumors started with the trailer for "28 Years Later", the sequel to the horror classic "28 Days Later". Many viewers were convinced that they recognized Cillian Murphy, who played Jim in the first part. An infected character with prominent cheekbones and a "Peaky Blinders"-style haircut was identified as the returning Jim. But that's far from the truth!

Producer Andrew Macdonald confirmed to Empire that Cillian Murphy will not be in the first film of the new trilogy. However, he could make an appearance in the sequel "28 Days Later: The Bone Temple", which is being directed by Nia DaCosta.

The man who sparked the internet sensation is Angus Neill. Director Danny Boyle was even warned by his partner that viewers might confuse Neill with Jim. He dismissed this as nonsense, but was later convinced otherwise. "28 Years Later" awaits us in cinemas on June 20.

Image of 28 YEARS LATER Trailer (2025)

The Significance of Danny Boyle's 28 Days Later

Danny Boyle's 2002 film "28 Days Later" is much more than a conventional zombie movie. With its unique approach to the genre, its stylistic design and its deep thematic layers, the film has had a lasting impact on pop culture and redefined the horror genre.

A New Face of Horror

"28 Days Later" begins with a radical break from classic zombie movies. The infected in Boyle's film are not the traditional, shuffling undead, but frenzied, hyper-aggressive creatures. This depiction, coupled with the fact that the infection is triggered by the "Rage" virus, lends the film a menacing topicality. The idea of a rapidly spreading epidemic reflects real fears of global pandemics. Boyle's work was released at a time when diseases such as SARS were worrying the world – a context that made the film even more relevant.

Social Criticism and Human Nature

At first glance, "28 Days Later" may seem like an apocalyptic action film, but on closer inspection it turns out to be a profound social critique. The film's central question is: what happens to humanity when civilization collapses? In a world in which the structures of state and society have crumbled, Boyle shows the best and worst sides of human nature.

The infected themselves act as a mirror for the uncontrolled violence and selfishness that can also be found in the surviving humans. This becomes particularly clear in the second half of the film, when the protagonists encounter a group of soldiers. Although they have survived, they have largely abandoned their morals and attempt to enslave the women in the group. Here Boyle shows that the greatest threat is not the infected, but the people themselves when they give in to their baser urges.

The Power of Isolation

The opening scene of "28 Days Later", in which the protagonist Jim wakes up in a deserted London, has become iconic. The deserted streets, filmed in a documentary style, convey a sense of isolation and forlornness. This visual representation of loneliness not only emphasizes the existential themes of the film, but also highlights Boyle's exceptional direction. The low-budget aesthetic with which the film was shot helps to make the world feel realistic and tangible.

The isolation Jim experiences is not only physical, but also psychological. The movie uses this isolation to raise questions about identity and community: Who are we without society? How do we define ourselves when all structures disappear? These questions make "28 Days Later" a philosophical work that goes far beyond the boundaries of the horror genre.

Influence on the genre

Boyle's movie had an enormous influence on the zombie genre and horror cinema as a whole. The raging infected and the overarching theme of the plague invasion became integral parts of the genre and influenced later works such as "World War Z" (2013) and the successful series "The Walking Dead" (from 2010). The aesthetics of low-budget films, which impress with their raw and realistic depiction, were also redefined by "28 Days Later".

In addition, the movie brought the theme of human abysses to the fore. While classic zombie films often focus on social satire, such as in George A. Romero's "Dawn of the Dead" (1978), Boyle goes one step further by putting civilization itself to the test. The film shows a world in which morals and ethics have become negotiable - a topic that seems particularly relevant at a time of political and social uncertainty.

Conclusion

"28 Days Later" is more than a horror classic; it is a movie that breaks genre boundaries and poses deeper questions about human nature and society. With its intense portrayal of fear, isolation and moral decay, Boyle creates a work that is both shocking and thought-provoking. Through its innovative approach, its social relevance and its lasting influence on cinema, "28 Days Later" remains a milestone that has significance far beyond its year of release.

Image of 28 DAYS LATER Trailer (2003) Cillian Murphy